Sins of My Father

Sins of My Father

Directed: Nicolas Entel
Written: Nicolas Entel and Pablo Farina
Argentina, 94 min.

My soda intake this last week has been out of control. I never thought I’d say this, but I think a steady diet of diet, caffeinated, carbonated beverages may be medically harmful. It’s certainly not good for you, and I realized just how dependent I was this morning when I tried to watch the film “Sins of My Father.”

This documentary from Argentina was definitely hurt by my lack of caffeine, but this mild drug wasn’t the only thing to blame for putting me to sleep. “Sins of My Father” has an excellent premise: Pablo Escobar’s son speaks about his father publicly for the first time since the drug lord’s death in 1993. In order to assuage his guilty conscious and pave the way for peace in Columbia, Escobar Jr. (who has changed his name to Sebastian Marroquin) tries to apologize to the sons of the men his father had killed.

Pablo Escobar was a criminal. But he also helped his community by buying housing projects and soccer fields for the poor. Most importantly to this film, he was also a husband and father. Sebastian talks about his views of his father, whom he still loves, and how his feelings have been complicated by the nasty things his father did. Director Nicolas Entel also interviews the sons of assassinated Columbian politicians Luis Carlos Galan and Rodrigo Lara Bonilla to obtain personal, subjective views of the story of Escabar’s rise to power on both sides. The main draw of the film is the effect their fathers had on all of these sons’ lives. While Galan and Bonilla’s can live with the pride of their fathers’ martyrdom, Marroquin suffers as though he were the criminal.

While Entel had access to the home movies of the Escobars, there doesn’t seem to be much there of interest. The story of Escobar is told mostly through stock footage filmed by news crews in Columbia, which is often shaky and dull. Using subjective voices to tell the story of a notorious criminal is a compelling idea in theory, but in practice, these relatives don’t have much to tell outside of what was already known about Columbian crime. Without the false tension created by Marroquin’s apology at the end of the film, “Sins of My Father” is simply a biography without any expert testimony. And because of the repetitious editing of Marroquin’s feelings, this biography gives us a lot of information we’ve already heard; it just gives us that information a little more slowly.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Film Festivals, Whitney

5 responses to “Sins of My Father

  1. Juan Tonto

    You really are ignorant.
    1. It’s the hottest doc at Sundance. Read the Hollywood Reporter, LA Times or any other review.
    2. It’s Escobar, not Escobar.
    3. Subjective? What about personal? You watch too much history channel and no real docs.
    Grow up!

    • Long time reader?
      1. Trust me, I know it’s the hottest doc at Sundance. My husband wasn’t able to get in because he went to go get me a soda and they had stopped letting in ticket holders. So he had to deal with a bunch of jerks in line that blamed it on the volunteers. But I also know that things that are the hottest at Sundance aren’t always the best things there. “Grown Up Movie Star” for example, hasn’t been getting any “buzz,” while “Douchebag” is…so there you have it.
      2. Sorry about the misspelling. I did it twice, and I always forget how arguments can be debased on grammar and spelling alone.
      3. I thought the “personal” was implied in the “subjective” and also my annoyingly frequent use of the word “feelings.” Also, I do not have television.

      Thank you. I will. Also, can I ask how you found Dear Jesus? Have you been attending the festival this year?

  2. Juan Tonto, there are plenty of negative reviews for Sins of My Father if you’d take the time to look. Also, you wrote “It’s Escobar, not Escobar.” Now who’s teaching the ignorant? Also, how do you know what she’s been watching?

  3. Sins of My Father may have been all the rage but it didn’t win the Special Jury Prize it was up for.

  4. Oh wait, it didn’t win anything at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s